Since my return from p. 427. Unfortunately Europe, owing to Dr Eitel's persistent attacks on the organization, my time has been unduly occupied in what appears to me unnecessary correspondence, repeating year after year, two or three times in the same year, the same explanations and rebutting the same charges.
Dr Eitel's ideal subordinate master who is meditating from morning to night on improvement of his class does not (I fancy) yet exist in real life. Even a Head Master whose duty compels him to spend more time in thought and study for this purpose is liable to lose energy and vigour in accordance with the adage "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy."
The absence of a note book is no sign that lessons are unprepared, for masters giving the same lessons over and over again, year after year, do not require the same amount of preparation as is needed in the First Class where some subjects vary annually.
The Junior classes have nine (9) hours weekly, the Senior ten (10) hours. The "frequent and lengthy interruptions" consist of half an hour's drill twice a week for each class. If drill is abolished, these interruptions will cease.
"The Head Master does not profess..." I have my ideas about a curriculum for Blumen School, but I am of opinion that no European is so competent to determine what is necessary and sufficient for Chinese Instruction as Chinese Masters of good reputation and degree, who sit in conclave and arrange the books and subjects that appear to them best to suit the requirements of their copatriots.
Dr Eitel's position appears doubly inconsistent: (1) he wishes in the same paragraph to give more power to these Chinese Masters, while grudging them a particular privilege; (2) in the previous paragraph, he apparently wishes English Assistants to draw up their own Time Table.
"Loud Memoriter repetition" is, as Dr Eitel is doubtless aware, the occupation of the first three or four years of a Chinese youth's study; boys who come to Victoria College have generally been four or five years in Chinese schools previously. See above p. 5.
8. Staff of Chinese Division "roughly classified sets of scholars." The scholars are classified in accordance with a list carefully drawn up by five Chinese scholars of recognised ability, each boy's place being assigned according to his attainments displayed in passing the half-yearly Examination.
The Junior classes have nine (9) hours weekly. "Individual teaching" is only possible in classes not exceeding 30 (thirty) in number, and with school hours lasting from sunrise to sunset.
The Chinese masters do their duty faithfully; responsibility is not absent. But even in the Head Master's rule, where supervision is wanting, is to me unintelligible.
The supervision by the English Master is not...
Page 1333
Since
my
return from p. 427. Unfortunately Europe, owing to Dr Extel's persistent attacks on the organization, my time has been unduly oc=
to me unnecessary. appears cupied in what correspondence, repeating year after year,
two or three times in the same
year same explanations and rebutting the same Charges.
even
and
the
Dr Eitel's ideal subordinate master
the who is meditating from morning to night on improvement of his class does not (I fancy) yet exist in real life.
in real life. Even a Head Master whose fuli compels him to spend more time in thought and study for this purpose is liable to lose energy
and vigour in accordance with the adage "All work and no
play makes Jack a dull boy"
The absence
uf
note book is no sign
that lessons are unprepared, for masters giving
the same lessons over and over
again, year after year, do not require the same amount of prepara=
of tion as is needed in in the three sections. First Class where some su bjects vary annually.
1333
weekly, the Lenior ten (10) hours. The "frequent and lengity interruptions" "consist of half an hour's drill twice a week for each class. If drill is abolished there interruptions will cease.
"The Head Master does not profess rc"
ocon
I have my
ideas about a curriculum for blumene School, but I am of opinion that no European is so competent to determined what is necessary and sufficient for Chinese Instruction as Chinese Masters of good reputation and degree, who sit in conclave and arrange the books and subjects appears to them best to suit the requirements of then copatriots.
ar
Dr Eitil's position appears doubly in con= sistent (1) he wishes in the same paragraph to give more power to these Chinese Masters, while grudging themetics particular privilege. (2) in the previous paragraph
apparently wishes English Arristants to draw up their own Time Table
Loud Memoriter repetition" is as DrEitel is doubtless aware the occupation of the first three or four years of a Chinese youth's study; boys who come to Victoria
bollege
have generally been four or five to Chinese
hools previously. See above pa. 5.
the
years
scholars"
8. Staff of Chinese Division "roughly classified sets of The scholars are classified in accordance with a list carefully drawn up by five Chinese scholars of recognised ability, each boy's place being ussigned according to his attainments displayed in passing the half-yearly Examination.
The Junior classes have nine (9) hours
weekly
"Individual leaching" is only possible
well
in classes not exceeding 30 (thirty) in number, and with school hours lasting from sunrise to sunset
The Chinese masters do their duty and faictifully, responsibility is not absent. But even in the Head Master's rule is here wanting is to me unintelligible.
The supervision by the English Master
is not
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.